UNITED STATES v. COOPER et al. - Revision history

Randylyon at 23:27, 5 April 2017

2017-04-05T23:27:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:27, 5 April 2017
Line 21:		Line 21:
	At the end of the trial, officials in the income tax department and revenue officers of the state declared that the verdict in the Cooper case would have nation-wide effect. According the the ''Telegraph Herald'' these officials felt that a "not guilty" verdict would have 'endangered" tax laws and excess profits tax laws all over the United States.		At the end of the trial, officials in the income tax department and revenue officers of the state declared that the verdict in the Cooper case would have nation-wide effect. According the the ''Telegraph Herald'' these officials felt that a "not guilty" verdict would have 'endangered" tax laws and excess profits tax laws all over the United States.

	The jury found the men guilty. On June 28, 1923 Federal Judge George C. Scott overruled their plea for a new trial based on seventy-eight reasons presented by the defense. Judge Scott fined each man $10,000 and one-half of the court costs. (2)		The jury found the men guilty. (2) On June 28, 1923 Federal Judge George C. Scott overruled their plea for a new trial based on seventy-eight reasons presented by the defense. Judge Scott fined each man $10,000 and one-half of the court costs. (3)

	The Coopers appealed the verdict in the case of [[COOPER et al. v. UNITED STATES]]		The Coopers appealed the verdict in the case of [[COOPER et al. v. UNITED STATES]]
Line 32:		Line 32:

	2. "Coopers Found Guilty by U. S. Jury Thursday," ''Telegraph Herald'', June 1, 1923, p. 1		2. "Coopers Found Guilty by U. S. Jury Thursday," ''Telegraph Herald'', June 1, 1923, p. 1

			3. "Judge Scott Orders Costs Divided 50-50." ''Telegraph Herald'', June 28, 1923, p. 1

	Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. COOPER v. UNITED STATES 9 F.2d 216 (8th Cir. 1925)		Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. COOPER v. UNITED STATES 9 F.2d 216 (8th Cir. 1925)

Randylyon at 03:46, 9 March 2017

2017-03-09T03:46:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:46, 9 March 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
	UNITED STATES v. COOPER et al. On June 1, 1923 the jury returned its verdict in a trial lasting approximately four weeks involving over one hundred witnesses in Waterloo, Iowa against A. A. Cooper and Wm. F. Cooper, ~~sons of [[COOPER, Augustin A.\|Augustin A. COOPER]].~~ The charges against them were that:		UNITED STATES v. COOPER et al. On April 13, 1922 the two sons of [[COOPER, Augustin A.\|Augustin A. COOPER]] were arrested at their offices. They were later released after posting bond of $5,000 each. Also charged was their sister Katheryn J. Cooper. The charges were that Austin A. Cooper had unpaid income taxes from 1918-1920 for a total of $56,300.80; Austin A. Cooper Inc. for $600,86; and A. A. Cooper Wagon & Buggy Company for $72,280.97. Over the same years, William F. Cooper had unpaid taxes of $27,747.78 and Katheryn Cooper owed $12.367.15. Under the tax laws, 50% would be added to the total amount due if it were proved that there was evasion by fraud. (1)

			On June 1, 1923 the jury returned its verdict in a trial lasting approximately four weeks involving over one hundred witnesses in Waterloo, Iowa against Austin A. Cooper and Wm. F. Cooper, The charges against them were that:
	1) The A. A. Cooper Wagon and Buggy Company, during the tax year 1918, had a		1) The A. A. Cooper Wagon and Buggy Company, during the tax year 1918, had a
	gross income which, after allowing all deductions and credits permitted by		gross income which, after allowing all deductions and credits permitted by
Line 19:		Line 21:
	At the end of the trial, officials in the income tax department and revenue officers of the state declared that the verdict in the Cooper case would have nation-wide effect. According the the ''Telegraph Herald'' these officials felt that a "not guilty" verdict would have 'endangered" tax laws and excess profits tax laws all over the United States.		At the end of the trial, officials in the income tax department and revenue officers of the state declared that the verdict in the Cooper case would have nation-wide effect. According the the ''Telegraph Herald'' these officials felt that a "not guilty" verdict would have 'endangered" tax laws and excess profits tax laws all over the United States.

	The jury found the men guilty. On June 28, 1923 Federal Judge George C. Scott overruled their plea for a new trial based on seventy-eight reasons presented by the defense. Judge Scott fined each man $10,000 and one-half of the court costs.		The jury found the men guilty. On June 28, 1923 Federal Judge George C. Scott overruled their plea for a new trial based on seventy-eight reasons presented by the defense. Judge Scott fined each man $10,000 and one-half of the court costs. (2)

	The Coopers appealed the verdict in the case of [[COOPER et al. v. UNITED STATES]]		The Coopers appealed the verdict in the case of [[COOPER et al. v. UNITED STATES]]
Line 27:		Line 29:
	Source:		Source:

	1. "Coopers Found Guilty by U. S. Jury Thursday," ''Telegraph Herald'', June 1, 1923, p. 1		1. "Cooper Heirs Indicted on Many Counts," ''Telegraph Herald'', April 13, 1922, p. 2

			2. "Coopers Found Guilty by U. S. Jury Thursday," ''Telegraph Herald'', June 1, 1923, p. 1

	Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. COOPER v. UNITED STATES 9 F.2d 216 (8th Cir. 1925)		Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. COOPER v. UNITED STATES 9 F.2d 216 (8th Cir. 1925)

Randylyon at 03:49, 16 September 2016

2016-09-16T03:49:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:49, 16 September 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
	UNITED STATES v. COOPER et al. On June 1, 1923 the jury returned its verdict in a trial lasting approximately four weeks involving over one hundred witnesses in Waterloo, Iowa against A. A. Cooper and Wm. F. Cooper, sons of [[COOPER, ~~Augustine~~ A.\|~~Augustine~~ A. COOPER]]. The charges against them were that:		UNITED STATES v. COOPER et al. On June 1, 1923 the jury returned its verdict in a trial lasting approximately four weeks involving over one hundred witnesses in Waterloo, Iowa against A. A. Cooper and Wm. F. Cooper, sons of [[COOPER, Augustin A.\|Augustin A. COOPER]]. The charges against them were that:
	1) The A. A. Cooper Wagon and Buggy Company, during the tax year 1918, had a		1) The A. A. Cooper Wagon and Buggy Company, during the tax year 1918, had a
	gross income which, after allowing all deductions and credits permitted by		gross income which, after allowing all deductions and credits permitted by

Randylyon at 03:18, 23 June 2016

2016-06-23T03:18:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:18, 23 June 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
	UNITED STATES v. COOPER et al. On June 1, 1923 the jury returned its verdict in a trial lasting approximately four weeks involving over one hundred witnesses in Waterloo, Iowa against A. A. Cooper and Wm. F. Cooper, sons of [[COOPER, ~~Austin~~ Augustine\|~~Austin~~ Augustine COOPER]]. The charges against them were that:		UNITED STATES v. COOPER et al. On June 1, 1923 the jury returned its verdict in a trial lasting approximately four weeks involving over one hundred witnesses in Waterloo, Iowa against A. A. Cooper and Wm. F. Cooper, sons of [[COOPER, Augustine A.\|Augustine A. COOPER]]. The charges against them were that:
	1) The A. A. Cooper Wagon and Buggy Company, during the tax year 1918, had a		1) The A. A. Cooper Wagon and Buggy Company, during the tax year 1918, had a
	gross income which, after allowing all deductions and credits permitted by		gross income which, after allowing all deductions and credits permitted by

Randylyon at 00:27, 24 February 2016

2016-02-24T00:27:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:27, 24 February 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
	UNITED STATES v. COOPER et al. On June 1, 1923 the jury returned its verdict in a trial lasting approximately four weeks involving over one hundred witnesses in Waterloo, Iowa against A. A. Cooper and Wm. F. Cooper, sons of [[COOPER, Augustine A.\|Augustine A. COOPER]]. The charges against them were that:		UNITED STATES v. COOPER et al. On June 1, 1923 the jury returned its verdict in a trial lasting approximately four weeks involving over one hundred witnesses in Waterloo, Iowa against A. A. Cooper and Wm. F. Cooper, sons of [[COOPER, Austin Augustine\|Austin Augustine COOPER]]. The charges against them were that:
	1) The A. A. Cooper Wagon and Buggy Company, during the tax year 1918, had a		1) The A. A. Cooper Wagon and Buggy Company, during the tax year 1918, had a
	gross income which, after allowing all deductions and credits permitted by		gross income which, after allowing all deductions and credits permitted by

Randylyon at 03:15, 2 July 2015

2015-07-02T03:15:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:15, 2 July 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	UNITED STATES v. COOPER et al. On June 1, 1923 the jury returned its verdict in a trial lasting approximately four weeks involving over one hundred witnesses in Waterloo, Iowa against A. A. Cooper and Wm. F. Cooper, sons of [[COOPER, ~~Austin~~ Augustine\|~~Austin~~ Augustine COOPER]]. The charges against them were that:		UNITED STATES v. COOPER et al. On June 1, 1923 the jury returned its verdict in a trial lasting approximately four weeks involving over one hundred witnesses in Waterloo, Iowa against A. A. Cooper and Wm. F. Cooper, sons of [[COOPER, Augustine A.\|Augustine A. COOPER]]. The charges against them were that:
	1) The A. A. Cooper Wagon and Buggy Company, during the tax year 1918, had a		1) The A. A. Cooper Wagon and Buggy Company, during the tax year 1918, had a
	gross income which, after allowing all deductions and credits permitted by		gross income which, after allowing all deductions and credits permitted by

Randylyon at 23:27, 19 November 2014

2014-11-19T23:27:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:27, 19 November 2014
Line 26:		Line 26:

	Source:		Source:

			1. "Coopers Found Guilty by U. S. Jury Thursday," ''Telegraph Herald'', June 1, 1923, p. 1

	Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. COOPER v. UNITED STATES 9 F.2d 216 (8th Cir. 1925)		Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. COOPER v. UNITED STATES 9 F.2d 216 (8th Cir. 1925)

Randylyon at 04:11, 19 November 2014

2014-11-19T04:11:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:11, 19 November 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	UNITED STATES v. COOPER et al~~. Legal case~~. On June 1, 1923 the jury returned its verdict in a trial lasting approximately four weeks involving over one hundred witnesses in Waterloo, Iowa against A. A. Cooper and Wm. F. Cooper, sons of [[COOPER, Austin Augustine\|Austin Augustine COOPER]]. The charges against them were that:		UNITED STATES v. COOPER et al. On June 1, 1923 the jury returned its verdict in a trial lasting approximately four weeks involving over one hundred witnesses in Waterloo, Iowa against A. A. Cooper and Wm. F. Cooper, sons of [[COOPER, Austin Augustine\|Austin Augustine COOPER]]. The charges against them were that:
	1) The A. A. Cooper Wagon and Buggy Company, during the tax year 1918, had a		1) The A. A. Cooper Wagon and Buggy Company, during the tax year 1918, had a
	gross income which, after allowing all deductions and credits permitted by		gross income which, after allowing all deductions and credits permitted by

Randylyon at 02:59, 19 November 2014

2014-11-19T02:59:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:59, 19 November 2014
Line 22:		Line 22:

	The Coopers appealed the verdict in the case of [[COOPER et al. v. UNITED STATES]]		The Coopers appealed the verdict in the case of [[COOPER et al. v. UNITED STATES]]

			---

			Source:

			Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. COOPER v. UNITED STATES 9 F.2d 216 (8th Cir. 1925)
			Online: https://casetext.com/case/cooper-v-united-states-25

	[[Category: Legal Cases]]		[[Category: Legal Cases]]

Randylyon at 03:44, 29 October 2014

2014-10-29T03:44:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:44, 29 October 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	UNITED STATES v. COOPER et al. Legal case. On June 1, 1923 the jury returned its verdict in a trial lasting approximately four weeks involving over one hundred witnesses in Waterloo, Iowa against A. A. Cooper and Wm. F. Cooper, sons of [[COOPER, Augustine A.\|Augustine A. COOPER]]. The charges against them were that:		UNITED STATES v. COOPER et al. Legal case. On June 1, 1923 the jury returned its verdict in a trial lasting approximately four weeks involving over one hundred witnesses in Waterloo, Iowa against A. A. Cooper and Wm. F. Cooper, sons of [[COOPER, Austin Augustine\|Austin Augustine COOPER]]. The charges against them were that:
	1) The A. A. Cooper Wagon and Buggy Company, during the tax year 1918, had a		1) The A. A. Cooper Wagon and Buggy Company, during the tax year 1918, had a
	gross income which, after allowing all deductions and credits permitted by		gross income which, after allowing all deductions and credits permitted by